Exactlly Guide ERP COMPLIANCE

Highlights of the GST Model Law — A Compliance Reading

GST model law — changes, additions, and exclusions in the November 2016 draft covering thresholds, composition scheme, ITC rules, and transition provisions.

Exactlly Team 18 min read
Finance head and accountant reviewing the GST Model Law draft including threshold limits, composition scheme rules, input tax credit conditions, and transition provisions
In this guide

GST model law — changes, additions, and exclusions in the November 2016 draft covering thresholds, composition scheme, ITC rules, and transition provisions.

The November 2016 draft of the GST Model Law was the version operational businesses began their transition planning against — registration thresholds, composition scheme economics, time-of-supply mechanics, input tax credit conditions, and the transitional provisions that determined how previous-regime balances would carry forward. The draft revised several positions from the earlier June 2016 version, added new definitions, and excluded certain activities from the deemed-supply schedule. For a finance head reading the document with a compliance posture, the question is not philosophical — it is which specific positions changed against the earlier draft, what was newly defined, and what was excluded that materially affects the entity's transition planning.

The GST model law highlights covered below sequence the changes, additions, and exclusions in the order they affect transition decisions — threshold and registration, composition scheme economics, time-of-supply rules, input tax credit conditions, transition provisions, and the deemed-supply schedule. Each shift in the draft text translates to a configuration or sign-off decision the finance team has to take before any post-transition invoice. Missing these distinctions produces GST filing errors and input tax credit mismatches that surface months later in the audit cycle. The broader ERP subject area discussion for compliance-led businesses treats this kind of statutory reading as the foundation of the configuration brief that the implementation partner works against.

When and why to use this compliance reading

This compliance reading applies to finance heads, accountants, and tax advisors preparing their transition response against the November 2016 GST Model Law draft, particularly those already familiar with the June 2016 version who need to identify what changed. Each item below names a specific provision of the draft along with its compliance implication. The accountant uses this reading as input to the chart of accounts redesign, tax master configuration, and transition credit computation. The finance head signs off the readings as part of the assessment stage before the system configuration begins.

The compliance checklist for the GST Model Law highlights

The items below are grouped under three categories — the changes made in the November 2016 draft against the June 2016 version, the additions newly introduced in the November 2016 draft, and the exclusions made by deleting earlier provisions.

Key changes made in the November 2016 draft

  1. Higher registration threshold — INR 10 lakh and INR 20 lakh.

    The registration threshold for special category states (Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Jammu and Kashmir, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, Tripura, Himachal Pradesh, and Uttarakhand) was increased from INR 5 lakh to INR 10 lakh; the threshold for the rest of the country was increased from INR 10 lakh to INR 20 lakh. The amounts are subject to further increase by government notification. The finance head reviews the entity's aggregate turnover against these revised thresholds before the registration application is filed.

  2. Aggregate turnover composition — taxable, exempt, and export supplies included.

    Aggregate turnover for registration purposes was clarified to include taxable supplies, exempt supplies, and export supplies, but to exclude non-taxable supplies. The accountant computes aggregate turnover across all units under the same PAN on this basis, not state-by-state. Misreading this composition (typically by excluding exempt supplies) understates the threshold position and produces an incorrect registration decision.

  3. Import of services — consideration is mandatory.

    The treatment of import of services was revised — the supply may or may not be in the course or furtherance of business, but it must be made for consideration. The earlier position that allowed the consideration to be optional was removed. Cross-border service procurement at the head office is reviewed against this revised position to confirm whether the import triggers GST liability under the configured reverse charge mechanism.

  4. Composition scheme rate — minimum 2.5% for manufacturers, 1% for others.

    The composition levy rate for manufacturers was increased from "not less than 1%" to "not less than 2.5%" of the turnover in a state or Union Territory during a financial year, with the rate for persons other than manufacturers retained at 1%. The owner and finance head review the composition economics against the revised manufacturer rate before the scheme choice is signed off, since the effective tax rate change affects customer-facing pricing and downstream margin.

  5. Composition scheme — additional restrictions on eligibility.

    In addition to the existing restriction on registered taxable persons engaged in inter-state outward supply, the November 2016 draft added that a composition taxpayer cannot be engaged in supply of services or goods not leviable to tax under GST, cannot supply goods through an e-commerce operator, and cannot manufacture goods specifically notified by the GST Council. Entities considering the composition scheme review their activity mix against these expanded restrictions before electing the scheme.

  6. Time of supply — forward charge on goods simplified.

    The forward charge time-of-supply rules for goods were simplified. The earliest of two dates is now maintained — the date of invoice and the date of receipt of payment. The earlier requirement to maintain the date of removal of goods and the date of entry of receipt in the books of accounts was dropped. Where the invoice is issued within the prescribed period, the contingency provision for late invoice was also removed. The accountant configures the time-of-supply logic against the simplified rule.

  7. Time of supply — reverse charge on goods clarified.

    The reverse charge time-of-supply rules for goods now require maintaining the date of receipt of goods, the date of payment, and a date 30 days from the date of invoice. The earlier requirement to maintain the date of debit in the books of accounts was dropped. Where the invoice is issued within the prescribed period, the earliest of the date of payment and the date 60 days from the date of invoice are maintained. The accountant configures the reverse charge engine against these revised dates.

  8. Subsidies — linked to price, not value of supply.

    The treatment of subsidies in the value of supply was revised — subsidies are now linked to the price of supply rather than the value, except for subsidies provided by the central or state government which continue to be excluded from the value. The finance head reviews entity-level subsidy mechanisms against this revised linkage to confirm correct value-of-supply computation.

  9. Input tax credit on job-work — twelve months for inputs, three years for capital goods.

    The window for the principal manufacturer to receive back inputs sent for job-work was extended — from 180 days to one year for inputs, and from two years to three years for capital goods. Where the goods are not received within the prescribed window, the supply is deemed to have taken place on the date of original dispatch and the principal manufacturer is liable to pay the tax accordingly. The accountant configures the job-work ageing tracker against these revised windows.

  10. Refund interest — 60 days for delay.

    The window for payment of interest on delayed refunds was reduced from three months to 60 days. The finance head tracks pending refund applications against this revised window to identify any interest claims arising from delay.

  11. Transitional credit — conditions for carry-forward simplified.

    For carrying forward input tax credit from the previous regime into GST, two conditions must be satisfied: the closing balance of ITC must reflect details of the last return filed, and the credit must be permitted as ITC under GST. The earlier provision requiring the credit to be allowed under the current law (the previous regime) was removed. The accountant computes the carry-forward against the simplified conditions; the finance head signs off the transition credit before the first GST return is filed.

Additions newly introduced in the November 2016 draft

  1. Definition of capital goods — capitalised in books and used for business.

    Capital goods were newly defined to mean goods, the value of which is capitalised in the books of accounts of the person claiming the credit, and which are used or intended to be used in the course or furtherance of business. The accountant uses this definition to classify each acquisition in the capital goods register against the input tax credit eligibility rules.

  2. Mixed supply and composite supply — newly defined.

    Mixed supply was defined as a combination of two or more individual supplies of goods or services made by a single taxable person for a single price. Composite supply was defined as a supply comprising two or more goods or services that are naturally combined or bundled and supplied to a recipient in the ordinary course of business. The classification matters for the rate applicable to the supply — composite supply takes the rate of the principal supply, while mixed supply takes the highest applicable rate among the components. The finance head reviews bundled offerings against these definitions before pricing is finalised.

  3. Time of supply for vouchers — issue or redemption.

    The time of supply for vouchers was specified as the earliest of two dates — the date of issue of the voucher where the voucher can be identified, or the date of redemption in any other case. Entities issuing gift vouchers, loyalty redemptions, or pre-paid instruments configure the time-of-supply logic accordingly. Where statutory payroll also forms part of the operational picture, HRMS for payroll and HR integration holds the same kind of cadence discipline for employee benefit redemptions tracked through the master.

  4. Penalty, interest, and late fee — taxable.

    Any interest, late fee, or penalty arising due to delayed payment relating to a supply was specified as taxable under GST. The accountant configures the penalty and interest ledgers to flow through the GST output liability rather than as miscellaneous receipts. The finance head signs off this configuration to prevent the post-cutover under-reporting of GST on incidental receipts.

  5. Post-supply discount — exclusion conditions.

    Post-supply discount can be excluded from the transaction value where two conditions hold: the discount is known pursuant to an agreement entered into at or before the time of supply and is linkable to the original invoice, and the recipient has reversed the input tax credit attributable to the discount. The accountant tracks the agreement terms and the ITC reversal evidence before any post-supply discount adjustment is processed.

  6. Reverse charge invoice — registered recipient must issue.

    A registered taxable person required to pay tax on reverse charge on inward supplies from unregistered persons must issue a tax invoice for such supplies. This is a documentary obligation that sits at the recipient end rather than the unregistered supplier end. The accountant configures the reverse charge invoicing logic to auto-issue this invoice at the time of recipient-side liability recognition.

  7. Capital goods ITC for pipelines and telecom towers — multi-year amortisation.

    Input tax credit on capital goods used for pipelines and telecommunication towers was specified to be availed over multiple years — up to one-third in the first financial year, up to two-thirds (including any claim from the first year) in the second year, and any remaining balance in subsequent financial years. The accountant maintains the year-by-year availment tracker against each such asset.

  8. Reversal of ITC on services — 90-day non-payment trigger.

    Where the recipient of a service does not pay the supplier the principal amount along with the tax payable within three months from the date of the invoice, the input tax credit already availed is added to the recipient's output tax liability along with applicable interest. The accountant maintains a 90-day ageing tracker on supplier-side service invoices; the finance head reviews the ageing position monthly to flag pending payment risk.

  9. Anti-profiteering clause.

    The anti-profiteering provision was introduced to examine whether benefits from input tax credit availability or rate reductions have been passed on to customers through corresponding reductions in price. The reduction in the price of goods or services helps to determine whether the ITC benefit has been availed by a registered taxable person or passed through to the customer. The finance head documents the pricing rationale against rate changes to defend the entity's position if challenged.

  10. Excise duty transition — closing stock by first stage dealer, second stage dealer, importer.

    First stage dealers, second stage dealers, and importers were specified to be able to avail input tax credit on excise duty embedded in closing stock as on the transition date, subject to documentation. The accountant maintains the stock-with-duty-evidence register for the transition cutover. Where deeper period-over-period reporting matters, BI for ERP reporting holds the multi-period view of transition credit utilisation against operational supply patterns.

  11. Entry tax transition — credit on closing stock.

    Entry tax paid under the previous regime on the value of closing stock held at the date of transition was specified to be available as input tax credit under GST, subject to the documentation requirements of the transition provisions. The accountant reconciles the entry tax records against the closing stock register before the carry-forward is computed.

  12. Service tax transition — exempt services taxable under GST.

    Service providers engaged in providing services that were exempt under the previous service tax regime but become taxable under GST were specified to be eligible for input tax credit on inputs used for such services, subject to the documentation rules. The finance head reviews the service mix against this provision before the transition credit claim is finalised.

Exclusions made in the November 2016 draft

  1. Schedule I — earlier deemed-supply activities removed.

    The Schedule I list of activities treated as supply even without consideration was revised. Four earlier activities were excluded: application of business assets temporarily to a use other than business, putting services to use for anything other than business, retaining assets after deregistration, and supplying goods or services by a taxable person to another taxable or non-taxable person in the course or furtherance of business. The retained Schedule I now lists four activities: transfer or disposal of business assets where input tax credit has been availed, supply of goods or services between related or distinct persons in the course or furtherance of business, supply by a principal to an agent or vice versa where either party undertakes to supply on behalf of the other, and importation of services by a taxable person from a related person or any establishment outside India. The accountant reviews the entity's inter-unit and related-party flows against the revised Schedule I before the operational configuration is finalised.

Facing similar operational challenges?

See how exactllyERP manages inventory management, financial operations, and operational reporting — built for operational businesses.

See how exactllyERP handles operational complexity →

How exactllyERP supports the GST Model Law compliance configuration

The provisions covered above translate into operational compliance only when the underlying tax engine, masters, and audit trail hold each provision as a configured rule rather than a manual checkpoint. exactllyERP eliminates GST filing errors and input tax credit mismatches by carrying the threshold logic, composition scheme parameters, time-of-supply rules, reverse charge auto-trigger, transition credit computation, capital goods classification, mixed and composite supply classification, post-supply discount handling, anti-profiteering documentation trail, and Schedule I deemed-supply mapping as configured masters. The GST-ready invoicing and GSTIN validation produce the documentary chain that the audit trail rests on.

How exactllyERP handles this automatically: items 7 and 9 (reverse charge time-of-supply and job-work ageing windows configured against the revised rules), items 12 and 13 (capital goods classification and mixed/composite supply rate application at item master), and items 11 and 21-23 (transition credit computation against closing stock, entry tax, and excise records) are the three sets of places where the November 2016 draft positions translate directly into the system configuration. The GSTR-1, GSTR-3B, and GSTR-2B reconciliation pull from the same chain that produced the invoice, so the commercial record matches the tax record. exactllyERP handles incorrect GSTR filing and HSN code mapping errors automatically through statutory updates absorbed inside the standard release cycle. See it live in a free demo against your transition position and a sample previous-quarter filing.

Common Questions
What is the GST model law and what does it cover?

The GST Model Law is the draft legislation circulated for public review and stakeholder feedback ahead of the introduction of the GST regime in India. The November 2016 draft of the Model Law revised several positions from the earlier June 2016 version, added new definitions, and excluded certain activities from earlier provisions. The draft covers the structural framework of GST — registration and threshold provisions, the composition levy scheme, time-of-supply rules for forward and reverse charge transactions, input tax credit eligibility and conditions, the value-of-supply rules, transitional provisions for carry-forward of credit from the previous regime, schedules listing deemed supplies, and statutory definitions. For operational businesses preparing for the transition, the Model Law provides the basis for configuring the chart of accounts, tax masters, time-of-supply logic, and the transition credit computation against the previous-regime closing position.

What is the model law compliance guide for growing businesses to read against the November 2016 draft?

The compliance reading runs across three categories of changes between the June 2016 and November 2016 drafts. Changes include higher registration thresholds (INR 10 lakh for special category states, INR 20 lakh for the rest of the country), composition scheme rate revisions (minimum 2.5% for manufacturers, 1% for others) and expanded eligibility restrictions, simplified time-of-supply rules for forward and reverse charge on goods, subsidies linked to price rather than value, extended job-work windows (one year for inputs, three years for capital goods), reduced interest payment window on delayed refunds (60 days), and simplified transitional credit conditions. Additions include definitions of capital goods, mixed supply, and composite supply, time-of-supply rules for vouchers, taxability of penalty and late fee, post-supply discount exclusion conditions, reverse charge invoice obligations at the recipient end, capital goods ITC amortisation for pipelines and telecom towers, ITC reversal on 90-day non-payment for services, the anti-profiteering clause, and transition credit on closing stock for excise, entry tax, and previously exempt services. Exclusions revise the Schedule I deemed-supply list by removing four earlier activities and retaining four.

What changed in the composition scheme under the November 2016 GST Model Law draft?

Two material changes were introduced. The composition levy rate for manufacturers was increased from "not less than 1%" to "not less than 2.5%" of the turnover in a state or Union Territory during a financial year, with the rate for persons other than manufacturers retained at 1%. The eligibility restrictions were expanded — in addition to the existing restriction on registered taxable persons engaged in inter-state outward supply, the November 2016 draft added that composition taxpayers cannot be engaged in supply of services or goods not leviable to tax under GST, cannot supply goods through an e-commerce operator, and cannot manufacture goods specifically notified by the GST Council. Entities considering the composition scheme should review their activity mix against these expanded restrictions before electing the scheme. The owner and finance head sign off on the scheme classification before the configuration begins, since the choice affects every downstream return filing cadence and customer-facing pricing decision.

What is the difference between mixed supply and composite supply under the GST model law?

Mixed supply is a combination of two or more individual supplies of goods or services made by a single taxable person for a single price, where the components are not naturally bundled. Composite supply is a supply comprising two or more goods or services that are naturally combined or bundled and supplied to a recipient in the ordinary course of business. The classification matters for the rate applicable — composite supply takes the rate of the principal supply (the predominant component of the bundle), while mixed supply takes the highest applicable rate among the components. For a bundle of taxable services sold as a single offering where the services are naturally bundled, the composite supply rule applies and the rate is that of the principal service. For a bundle of unrelated items sold together at a single price for promotional reasons, the mixed supply rule applies and the rate is the highest among the components. Finance heads review bundled offerings against these definitions before pricing is finalised so that the GST liability flows correctly through invoice posting.

What transitional provisions were specified in the November 2016 GST Model Law for previous-regime credit carry-forward?

The transitional provisions specified that input tax credit from the previous regime could be carried forward into GST subject to two conditions: the closing balance of ITC must reflect the details of the last return filed under the previous regime, and the credit must be permitted as ITC under GST. The earlier draft's additional requirement (that the credit be allowed under the current law of the previous regime) was removed in the November 2016 version. First stage dealers, second stage dealers, and importers were specified to be eligible for input tax credit on excise duty embedded in closing stock subject to documentation. Entry tax paid under the previous regime on closing stock was specified to be available as input tax credit under GST. Service providers engaged in providing services that were exempt under the previous service tax regime but become taxable under GST were specified to be eligible for input tax credit on inputs used for such services. The accountant maintains the transition credit register; the finance head signs off the carry-forward before the first GST return is filed.

Request a Demo

Want to see how this works
for your business?

A focused demo based on your workflows — not a generic product walkthrough.

No spam. No hard sell. We'll contact you within one business day.